Nobel Prize lacklusture

Is the Nobel committee a conglomerate of humor film directors? If someone pings a doubt none can argue or contradict. The recent Nobel Prize that has been awarded to the U.S president can be considered the result of an idiotic flaw of the jury. Nobel committee as quoted by the BBC said it awarded him the prize for his "extraordinary work to strengthen international diplomacy". It is  appropriate to say the committee with another quote should justify its act as an effort to help America survive an embattled economy.

What Obama did?. This is  really the million dollar question. Initiatives have never taken some one as Noble Laureate since history even if there are some exceptions . Mahathma Gandhi, who worked for peace fell short of winning the title even if he introduced a new way of life based on non violence. What would have been the factors that made Nobel committee reject Mahathma. This can be discussed in another post. There are still tensions there in the international community.

Israel and Palestine has never declared a permanent cease fire. Pakistan is continuing its hide and seek game with India for which the US only serves the role of a referee (though the game has got no referee since its birth). Then, how come the Nobel committee said "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples" helped him win the title.

Comment: Really feel sad to say the board of idiots have committed a crime